Friday, October 26, 2012

Legislative Update for the Week of October 22nd (Election Edition)

Matt Miner of Capital Strategies Group has prepared an Overview of the 2012 General Election Including Analysis of the Presidential, U.S. Senate, U.S. Congress, Michigan Supreme Court, Michigan State House of Representatives Races, as well as All Ballot Proposals. 


Presidential Election:

Polling in Michigan has shown a continual lead for President Obama since the two parties chose their respective candidate at convention. In recent weeks, Governor Romney has seen a significant rise in support as a large number of undecided voters have begun to choose him over the President. Below is a synopsis of polling conducted by five polling firms in Michigan from October 5th through October 17th and the results those polls produced. As you will see, President Obama has maintained an average of a five point lead in Michigan.

 


POLL

DATE

SAMPLE SIZE

MARGIN OF ERROR

OBAMA (D)

Romney (R)

SPREAD

BAYDOUN/FOSTER

10/23/12

1122

2.9%

47%

47%

TIE

EPIC MRA

10/17/12

800

3.5%

52%

46%

OBAMA +6%

RASMUSSEN REPORTS

10/11/12

500

4.5%

52%

45%

OBAMA +7%

LAMBERT EDWARDS/

10/10/12

600

4.0%

44%

41%

OBAMA +3%

DENNO RESEARCH

 

 

 

 

 

 

DETROIT NEWS

10/9/12

600

4.0%

49%

42%

OBAMA +7%

GRAVIS MARKETING

10/8/12

1122

3.2%

46%

44%

OBAMA +2%

Analysis:

At this moment, President Obama holds a slight advantage in Michigan, which would put Michigan’s 16 Electoral College Votes in the LEAN OBAMA category. With less than three weeks left in the race, it would take a considerable Get-Out-The-Vote program, coupled with depressed Democratic turnout at the polls for Romney to pull off the upset in Michigan. The reason Michigan is just a lean state for Obama is because a strong Democratic voter turnout is not guaranteed.

Nationally, it’s a different story. Polls seem to change daily, but Romney is making significant gains in previous strongholds for President Obama. In 2008, Obama took a whopping 365 Electoral College votes (270 needed to win). At this moment, he leads Governor Romney 237 Electoral College Votes to 219 Electoral College Votes in the latest national analysis. States like Indiana and North Carolina that went for Obama in 2008 are now likely Romney states (26 total electoral votes). Romney also holds leads in Colorado and Florida (38 total electoral votes). Should these states hold, Romney would have 257 Electoral College votes. One state could hold the key to the magic number of 270. That state would be Ohio. No Republican has ever become President without winning Ohio, so in short, this entire election boils down to Ohio.
US Senate Election:

Michigan’s 2012 U.S. Senate race was initially high on the list of toss-up races across the country by many political pundits, but in the last two months, Senator Debbie Stabenow has pulled away from former Congressman Pete Hoekstra making this race a LIKELY DEMOCRATIC seat. Stabenow has never been the most popular senator in the state; she narrowly defeated Republican Spencer Abraham in the generally good Democratic year of 2000, and won by 15 points against an underwhelming Republican in the solid Democratic year of 2006. Her approval ratings are mired in the 40’s, but Stabenow's competitor, Pete Hoekstra, inflicted a fairly serious wound upon himself with a widely panned Super Bowl commercial, and he has trailed consistently in the polls.
Below is a synopsis of polling conducted by four polling firms in Michigan from October 5th through October 11th and the results those polls produced.

 
POLL

DATE

SAMPLE SIZE

MARGIN OF ERROR
 STABENOW (D) HOEKSTRA (R) SPREAD
RASMUSSEN REPORTS           10/11/12

 

500

4.5%

51%

          39%

STABENOW +12%

DETROIT NEWS

10/8/12

600

4.0%

50%

          38%

STABENOW +12%

EPIC MRA

 

10/6/12

600

3.5%

55%

           35%

STABENOW +20%

BAYDOUN/FOSTER

10/5/12

1122

**

51%

         43%

STABENOW +8%

 
For a while it looked as if Hoekstra was in this race, but Stabenow has taken command since the Democratic convention. It would take a massive shift in the dynamics of this contest for Hoekstra to win at this point.

US House Elections:

In 2012, Michigan has fourteen Congressional seats up for grabs. Currently, Republican’s hold nine seats and Democrat’s hold five seats. Republicans can expect to return seven of those members to Washington and Democrats will likely return five of those members. That leaves two races up for grabs.





1st District – Congressman Dan Benishek Michigan's 1st Congressional District covers the Upper Peninsula, and the northeastern portion of the state's "mitt." The UP supplies most of the Democratic vote for the district and about half of the overall vote. Overall, this is marginally Republican political territory, having given George W. Bush 53 percent of the vote and Barack Obama 50 percent. Former State Representative Gary McDowell, who hails from the Upper Peninsula, and Dan Benishek, a Tea Party-inspired candidate squared off in 2010 where Benishek handily defeated McDowell. This time around, Benishek has two years in D.C. under his belt and a list of tough votes to contend with. McDowell is in a better position to capitalize on these issues given that it is a presidential year, but if Obama runs poorly in the Upper Peninsula, Benishek could survive the surge from McDowell. At this moment things are trending McDowell’s way. LEAN DEMOCRATIC.

11th District - The Northwestern Detroit suburbs have long been a GOP stronghold. Congressman Thaddeus McCotter represented this district until May of this year when the 11th then experienced one of the strangest sequences of events in electoral history. McCotter failed to submit enough signatures to qualify for the ballot. That left the GOP with reindeer farmer Kerry Bentivolio as its nominee. The libertarian Bentivolio is an odd fit for the district, to say the least. But Democrats were caught flat-footed by McCotter's failure as well. Syed Taj filed to run as the lone Democrat in the race and has invested considerable cash, but polls suggest he is struggling to gain traction. This race is a mess, and it is only the GOP base strength of the district that is saving Bentivolio. Either way, this race is in the spotlight and will likely be much closer than many on the outside thinks. LEAN REPUBLICAN.

At this moment, it appears that the Republicans will keep the 11th and lose the 1st leaving the Republicans with an 8-6 majority in Michigan.
 
 
Michigan Supereme Court:
 
This year, the Michigan Supreme Court has two full six year terms up for grabs and one partial term ending 1/1/2015 up. Currently, Michigan Republican’s hold a 4-3 advantage on the court. Of the three seats up this year, two of them are held by a Republican nominee. Here’s how the make-up of the court breaks out today.
Democratic Nominee

Term Expires

Republican Nominee

Term Expires

Michael Cavanaugh

1/1/2015

Robert Young

1/1/2017

Marilyn Kelly

1/1/2013

Stephen Markman

1/1/2013

Diane Hathaway

1/1/2017

Mary Beth Kelly

1/1/2019

 

 

Brian Zahra

1/1/2013
Each party has nominated three candidates for the ballot; two candidates each for the two full terms and one candidate each for the partial term. Below is a list of those nominees and a brief biography. It is noteworthy to point out that Marilyn Kelly was not renominated by the Democratic party as she is 70 years of age and unable to serve another term on the court. Interestingly enough, the Democrats found another Kelly to run in Connie Marie Kelly.
Republican Nominees for the term expiring 1/1/2020:
Justice Stephen Markman – Judge Stephen Markman served as Chief Counsel of the United States Senate Subcommittee on the Constitution and as Deputy Chief Counsel of the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary from 1978 to 1985. He was then nominated to be a United States Assistant Attorney General, heading the Justice Department's Office of Legal Policy, by President Ronald Reagan and confirmed by the Senate. After being nominated by George H. W. Bush and approved by the United States Senate, Markman served as a United States Attorney in Michigan from 1989-1993. He joined the private sector firm of Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone in Detroit, where he practiced until he was appointed to the 4th District Michigan Court of Appeals by Governor John Engler in 1995. He held that position until 1999, when Governor Engler appointed him to the Michigan Supreme Court. Michigan voters re-elected him to the position in 2000 and 2004.
Judge Colleen O’Brien - Judge Colleen A. O’Brien has served as a Judge of the Oakland County Circuit Court since winning election in 1998. Immediately following that election, she was appointed by Governor John Engler to take office immediately, to complete the term of her predecessor. She currently serves on the Circuit Court Criminal/Civil Division, where she has presided over thousands of both criminal and civil cases.
Democratic Nominees for the term expiring 1/1/2020:
Judge Connie Kelly – is a judge of the 3rd Circuit Court in Michigan. She was elected to this position on November 4, 2004 and was a private practice labor law attorney prior to her service on the bench.
Bridget McCormack Ms. McCormack is a law professor and Dean for Clinical Affairs at the University of Michigan Law School. 
Republican nominee for term expiring 1/1/2015:
 
Justice Brian Zahra Justice Zahra served as a Wayne County Circuit Court judge from 1994-98 and was appointed to the Michigan Court of Appeals by Republican Governor John Engler in 1999. In 2004, he was nominated and ran for the Michigan Supreme Court. While losing that bid for election, he remained on the Court of Appeals. Zahra then went on to serve as Chief Judge Pro Tem for the Court of Appeals from December 2005 to January 2007. On January 11, 2011, Republican Governor Rick Snyder appointed Zahra to replace Maura Corrigan, who was in turn appointed to head the Michigan Department of Human Services. Governor Snyder's appointment of Zahra maintained the Republican nominees' 4-3 majority.
 
Democratic nominee for term expiring 1/1/2015:
Judge Shelia Johnson Judge Johnson was elected in November 2002 and is the first African American to serve as Judge in the 46th District Court. In November 2008, she was re-elected for an unopposed second term. Prior to assuming the bench, Judge Johnson was an attorney with over 18 years of legal experience in both State and Federal Courts. Judge Johnson was in private practice in Southfield where she specialized in both civil and criminal litigation.

Although there is hardly any credible polling on these races, newspaper endorsements and Irish last names tend to rule the day in Supreme Court races. The general electorate just isn’t educated on many of the non-partisan races on the back side of the ballot. TV commercials have done a lot to bolster the name identification of the candidates, but the results of these and other non­partisan elections usually rest on the back of voter turnout. The major turnovers in the court came at times of drastically increased Democratic voter turnout (2008) and reduced Democratic voter turnout (1998).

Michigan House Elections:

The race for control of the Michigan House of Representatives is up for grabs once again this year. Although roughly 95 of the seats will likely have a predictable outcome, there are 16 seats that would be considered toss-ups going into the final couple weeks of the campaign. The winners of these 16 seats will decide who controls the House for the 2013-2014 legislative session. Currently, Republicans hold a 64-46 edge. Democrats need to pick up 9 seats to share control and 10 seats to gain control. Below is an analysis of 17 races that will play a role in deciding whether or not the Democrats will take control of the chamber. These races are ranked in order of their likelihood of changing hands.
1.    House District 76 - Newly converted Republican Representative Roy Schmidt faces Democrat Winnie Brinks in this 51% Republican seat. It appears that Mr. Schmidt’s party switch scheme was fatal and it is widely believed that Ms. Brinks has this race wrapped up. LEAN DEMOCRAT.
2.    House District 84 - Republican Dan Grimshaw ousted Representative Kurt Damrow in the primary election in August and is set to face former Representative Terry Brown, who lost to Damrow in 2010. This seat covers Tuscola and Huron Counties and has a 55% Republican base. This race will likely be close until the end with a slight edge to Brown who has considerable name ID. This would be a pick-up for Democrats. LEAN DEMOCRAT.
3.    House District 101 - Representative Ray Franz (Republican) faces Democrat Allen O’Shea in this seat which includes Mason, Manistee, Benzie and Leelanau Counties. This seat has a 53% Republican base. This race remains close but it appears Mr. O’Shea has the edge at this moment and has a better ground game than Representative Franz. While the seat is slightly Republican, it is considered one of the more volatile seats given the results of recent elections. LEAN DEMOCRAT.
4.    House District 57 - Representative Nancy Jenkins (Republican) faces former Democratic State Senator Jim Berryman in this seat that includes most of Leelanau County. This seat has a 53% Republican base. This race remains very close, but sources say Mr. Berryman has the edge at this moment. LEAN DEMOCRAT.
5.    House District 91 - Representative Holly Hughes (Republican) faces Democrat Colleen LaMonte in this seat which includes much of Muskegon County. This seat has a 52% Democratic base. This seat has switched parties more than any other seat in the last 30 years. This race will likely stay close until the end with no clear leader at this point. TOSS UP.
6.    House District 71 - Representative Deb Shaughnessy (Republican) faces a rematch with her 2010 opponent, Democrat Theresa Abed, whom she narrowly defeated. This is includes most of Eaton County and has a 51% Republican base. Recent polling suggests that it will be close until Election Day. TOSS UP.
7.    House District 52 - Representative Mark Ouimet (Republican) faces Gretchen Driskell in this that covers parts of Washtenaw County. This seat has a 52% Republican base. Both sides are poised to spend significant resources here and this one will likely go down to the wire. TOSS UP.
8.    House District 110 - Representative Matt Huuki faces Democrat Scott Dianda in this seat covering the northwest portion of the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. This seat has a 53% Democratic base. This race is a rematch from 2010 and it appears it will be as close this time around. Polling suggests a significant switch in party affiliation in the U.P. from Democrat to Republican, but this race will be close regardless. TOSS UP.
9. House District 63 Republican Speaker of the House Jase Bolger is facing a stiff challenge from Democrat Bill Farmer who is capitalizing on the scandal involving the Speaker and Representative Roy Schmidt, who switched parties earlier this year. Democrats have spent more than $300,000 on network ads attacking Mr. Bolger for his role in the election scheme. But it is still a 57 percent GOP seat, and Mr. Farmer is unknown. That said, polling suggests that this race is too close to call. TOSS UP.
10. House District 39 - Republican Klint Kesto faces Democrat Pam Jackson in this open seat which includes West Bloomfield, Commerce and Wixom in Oakland County. This seat has a 52% Republican base. Klint Kesto is a first time candidate who won a crowded primary, while Jackson has run for office several times and lost a close contest in 2010. This is ranked as one of the top battleground open seats in the House. TOSS UP.
11. House District 67 - Republican Jeff Oesterle faces Democrat Tom Cochren in this seat covering southern Ingham County. This seat has a 52% Democratic base. Mr. Oesterle narrowly lost to incumbent Representative Barb Byrum in 2010. Recent polling suggests Mr. Oesterle has significant name identification and will likely keep this race close until the end. This race is a top target for both parties and is too close to call at the moment. TOSS UP.
12. House District 25 - Republican Sean Clark is facing off against Democrat Henry Yanez in this seat consisting portions of Sterling Heights and Warren. This seat has a 52% Democratic base. This seat is targeted by both caucuses and will likely see significant attention and resources this month. This race is too close to call at this time. TOSS UP.
13. House District 103 - Representative Bruce Rendon faces Democrat Lon Johnson in this seat that includes Kalkaska, Crawford, Missaukee, Roscommon, and Ogemaw Counties. This seat has a 56% Republican base. Both parties are spending significant resources in this race and it will likely remain close until Election Day. LEAN REPUBLICAN.
14. House District 108 - Representative Ed McBroom faces Democrat Sharon Gray in this seat covering the Southwest Upper Peninsula of Michigan. This seat has a 51% Democratic base. In 2010 Republicans won 2 of the 3 U.P. seats for the first time in decades. Polling suggests a slight advantage for Republicans this year also. Right now, Representative McBroom maintains this advantage, but it will be close on Election Day. LEAN REPUBLICAN.
15. House District 70 - Representative Rick Outman (Republican) faces a rematch versus former Representative Mike Huckleberry (Democrat) in this seat that includes Montcalm and parts of Gratiot Counties. This seat has a 57% Republican base. LEAN REPUBLICAN.
16. House District 23 - Representative Pat Somerville (Republican) pulled off a stunning victory in 2010 in a seat covering most of southern Wayne County. This seat has a 53% Democratic base. He faces Tom Boritzki in the General election, who has not garnered much favor from the Democratic establishment. Pundits have this race leaning to Somerville at this moment. LEAN REPUBLICAN.
17. House District 106 - Representative Peter Pettalia (Republican) faces Democrat Kenneth Hubbard in this seat covering Iosco, Alcona, Alpena, Presque Isle, and Cheboygan Counties. This seat has a 51% Republican base. This seat has changed hands often in the last 20 years due to the strong Democratic base in Alpena. Mr. Pettalia has been a tireless campaigner and looks to have a slight advantage over his opponent at this moment. LEAN REPUBLICAN.


Michigan Ballot Proposals:

PROPOSAL 12-1
A REFERENDUM ON PUBLIC ACT 4 OF 2011 THE EMERGENCY MANAGER LAW Public Act 4 of 2011 would:
  • Establish criteria to assess the financial condition of local government units, including school districts.
  • Authorize Governor to appoint an emergency manager (EM) upon state finding of a financial emergency, and allow the EM to act in place of local government officials.
  • Require EM to develop financial and operating plans, which may include modification or termination of contracts,reorganization of government, and determination of expenditures, services, and use of assets until the emergency is resolved.
  • Alternatively, authorize state-appointed review team to enter into a local government approved consent decree.
People Voting Yes Are Saying…

  • A “YES” vote would uphold PA 4. This law ensures the state’s ability to offer early financial intervention and assistance to schools and local governments that are struggling financially before they reach a crisis.
  • Repealing the law would impede the ability of the state to provide important tools necessary to address immediate financial crises and will put state taxpayers on the hook for these locally incurred bad debts.
  • Local governments and schools currently being helped by this law could be adversely affected by its repeal, since the emergency managers could be forced to step down resulting in a reversal of financial stability.
People Voting No Are Saying…
  • A “NO” vote would repeal PA 4. This law would give too much power and oversight to the unelected emergency managers and would undercut the authority of local elected officials.
  • The law could impose substantial costs and expenses on affected local municipalities and school districts to get out of financial distress without providing new revenues.
  • The law would give the emergency manager wide discretion to invalidate contracts and impede existing collective bargaining agreements.
PROPOSAL 12-2
A PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE STATE CONSTITUTION REGARDING COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
This proposal would:

Grant public and private employees the constitutional right to organize and bargain collectively through labor unions.
 
Invalidate existing or future state or local laws that limit the ability to join unions and bargain collectively, and to negotiate and enforce collective bargaining agreements, including employees’ financial support of their labor unions. Laws may be enacted to prohibit public employees from striking.

Override state laws that regulate hours and conditions of employment to the extent that those laws conflict with collective bargaining agreements.
 
Define “employer” as a person or entity employing one or more employee.

People Voting Yes Are Saying…

Protection of collective bargaining should be a constitutional right for workers to assist employees in negotiating a fair contract and to protect their rights.
 
Collective bargaining should not just be a right provided to certain employees but should be extended to all employees regardless of their employer.  
 
This proposal would protect public and private employee’s jobs, wages, and benefits by making collective bargaining a constitutional right.

People Voting No Are Saying…

This amendment would limit or eliminate the state’s ability to regulate labor activities for both public and private employees.
 
This proposal would repeal an unidentified number of existing laws affecting both employees and job providers and would have an unknown impact on this vital relationship.
 
It is unwise to lock this proposal in the Michigan Constitution as it will make it difficult in the future for elected leaders to adapt to changing conditions.

PROPOSAL 12-3
A PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE STATE CONSTITUTION TO ESTABLISH A STANDARD FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY
This proposal would:

Require electric utilities to provide at least 25% of their annual retail sales of electricity from renewable energy sources, which are wind, solar, biomass, and hydropower, by 2025.

Limit to not more than 1% per year electric utility rate increases charged to consumers only to achieve compliance with the renewable energy standard.

Allow annual extensions of the deadline to meet the 25% standard in order to prevent rate increases over the 1% limit.
 
Require the legislature to enact additional laws to encourage the use of Michigan made equipment and employment of Michigan residents.

People Voting Yes Are Saying…
 
The amendment will require electricity providers to make major investments in Michigan, which will benefit the economy and create green jobs to promote clean energy.
 
The proposal protects consumers in the short term by capping rate increases caused by renewable energy regulations at1% per year.

Using clean, renewable energy will help reduce pollution and protect Michigan’s air, water, and land and help make Michigan more energy dependant.
People Voting No Are Saying…
 
Michigan consumers already pay the highest electricity rates in the Midwest and, despite the 1% annual cap on rate increases, consumers will experience long-term rate inflation until the renewable energy investments are paid off.
 
Michigan’s current energy mandate of 10% of electricity to be derived from renewable energy sources by 2015 still has not been achieved.
 
It is unwise to lock this proposal in the Michigan Constitution as it will make it difficult in the future to adapt to changing conditions and technology.
 
PROPOSAL 12-4
A PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE STATE CONSTITUTION TO ESTABLISH THE MICHIGAN QUALITY HOME CARE COUNCIL AND PROVIDE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING FOR IN-HOME CARE WORKERS
 
This proposal would:
 
Allow in-home care workers to bargain collectively with the Michigan Quality Home Care Council (MQHCC). Continue the current exclusive representative of in-home care workers until modified in accordance with labor laws.
 
Require MQHCC to provide training for in-home care workers, create a registry of workers who pass background checks, and provide financial services to patients to manage the cost of in-home care.
 
Preserve patients’ rights to hire in-home care workers who are not referred from the MQHCC registry who are bargaining unit members.
 
Authorize the MQHCC to set minimum compensation standards and terms and conditions of employment.

People Voting Yes Are Saying…
 
The proposal would provide in-home care workers a constitutional right to collective bargaining.

The Michigan Quality Home Care Council would provide training, background checks and a registry of in-home care workers which elderly and disabled persons may choose to hire for daily living assistance.

Would protect the authority, duties and obligations of the current Michigan Quality Community Care Council to provide access to well-trained in-home care workers.
 
People Voting No Are Saying…
These services are already available and could force terms of employment, such as joining a union and paying union dues, on in-home care workers, including relatives of the patient.
 
While all in-home care workers are directly employed by the elderly and disabled persons in need of services, they would be treated as public employees for the sole purpose of unionization.
 
It is unwise to lock this proposal in the Michigan Constitution as it will make it difficult in the future to update its provision to address changing conditions.
 
PROPOSAL 12-5
 
A PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE STATE CONSTITUTION TO LIMIT THE ENACTMENT OF NEW TAXES BY STATE GOVERNMENT
 
This proposal would:
 
Require a 2/3 majority vote of the State House and the State Senate, or a statewide vote of the people at a November election, in order for the State of Michigan to impose new or additional taxes on taxpayers or expand the base of taxation or increasing the rate of taxation.
 
This section shall in no way be construed to limit or modify tax limitations otherwise created in this Constitution.
 
People Voting Yes Are Saying…
 
This proposal would require a 2/3 majority vote of both the House and Senate or statewide vote of the people to enact tax increases.
 
The higher threshold for raising taxes would make it harder to impose new or additional taxes, expand the tax base, or increase tax rates.
 
The two most recent tax increases in Michigan were passed with support from only a slim majority of the Legislature.
 
Had this proposal been in place, it is likely that neither of these increases could have been passed by the Legislature.

People Voting No Are Saying…
 
This proposal would limit the Legislature’s ability to balance the state budget; and could result in funding cuts to education, public safety, or infrastructure projects.
 
This proposal would have no impact on current tax rates and could impede future tax reform for individuals and job providers.
 
It is unwise to lock this proposal in the Michigan Constitution as it will make it difficult in the future to update its provision to address changing conditions.
 
PROPOSAL 12-6
 
A PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE STATE CONSTITUTION REGARDING CONSTRUCTION OF INTERNATIONAL BRIDGES AND TUNNELS
This proposal would:
Require the approval of a majority of voters at a statewide election and in each municipality where “new international bridges or tunnels for motor vehicles” are to be located before the State of Michigan may expend state funds or resources for acquiring land, designing, soliciting bids for, constructing, financing, or promoting new international bridges or tunnels.
 
Create a definition of “new international bridges or tunnels for motor vehicles” that means, “any bridge or tunnel which is not open to the public and serving traffic as of January 1, 2012.”
 
People Voting Yes Are Saying…
Citizens should have the right to decide if the State should undertake major international bridges or tunnel projects for motor vehicles due to the possibility of ongoing taxpayer-funded expenses.
 
It is unclear if there is sufficient traffic to support the building of a second international bridge in Southeast Michigan and the State should not be in competition with a private entity.
 
This proposal may put the current Michigan-Canadian bridge project before the Michigan voters for their approval or rejection.
 
People Voting No Are Saying…
 
Given the traffic volume in Southeast Michigan, a second international bridge is critical for economic development and job creation in our state and will be paid for by Canadian funds and not state tax dollars.
 
The international bridge project agreement between Michigan and Canada may be exempt from the restrictions of this proposal.
 
It is unwise to lock this proposal in the Michigan Constitution as it will make it difficult in the future for elected leaders to adapt to changing conditions.
For those interested on how to get involved go to http://www.mdpac.org to find more information.
 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment